MERCHANDISE CONTACT
Ask the Referee: 2008 Outdoor Questions and Responses















  • (Aug 14th) Question 28:  In a GU18 match I had an odd incident which I'd like to share.  Near the end of the first half it was 5 to nil and clearly the winning team was all over the losing team, though the losing team was still playing some good soccer.  When the sixth goal went in the losing team's coach called all his players over to the sideline to give them a talk.
    I finished up writing in my book, waved on a substitution and then in a loud voice called,  "Come on Reds, let's go."  The red players all ran quickly back to their position so very little time was lost.
    At halftime one AR said "I couldn\'t believe the coach essentially called a time out.  I was wondering how you would handle it?"
    The other AR said he would have given the coach a warning and perhaps even ejected him from the field.
    I was comfortable with my actions though I would certainly have reacted differently if the game was close or if I felt it had been a tactical ploy.
    I was wondering if you have any suggestions?
    • Response:  There are NO time outs in Soccer and there is nothing wrong here if there is nothing gained.  If it is being done for tactical reasons (ie. in a game that is currently tied or a close diferencial in goals scored), then 1) The referee should be dealing with it long before he is done writing in his book.  And 2) The coach can be cautioned, as could any player involved.  Clearly you are not going to caution all of them (and I would suggest that the coach is the only one to get cautioned if anyone).

  • (Aug 14th) Question 27:  I have been told two ways for the Ref to signal for an offside infringement.
    One is to blow the whistle, indicate the direction of the kick and then raise the arm in the air indicating an indirect free kick.
    The other is not to signal direction but to blow the whistle and just to raise the arm indicating an indirect free kick.  Presumably the players will figure out what the call is for.
    Can you please confirm which is correct? 
    • Response:  It depends on who you ask.  In Canada this is actually a very regional thing.  Eastern Canada maintains steadfastly that offiside requires a 2-part signal (indicate direction and then indicate indirect).  Western Canada has traditionally gone in the other direction and decided on a 1-part signal (arm up only).  Personally, I never signal direction on offside.  I actually think it assists to clarify that it is offside and not a foul that is being called.  Most cases the players know what you are calling, but in the odd case they don'tt you may wish to voice out that it is an Offside Call.  FIFA would accept either method.












First let's deal with the events that transpired by the  FIFA Laws of the Game: The Ref stopped play by blowing the Whistle, therefore there is NO GOAL scored; The defending player is shown a RED card and dismissed from the Field of Play;  The attacking Team is awarded a penalty kick; After the game the Ref would need to fill out a Misconduct Report and submit it with the game sheets and the defending player's ID Card; and I suspect you will need to calm down the Coaches, players, and/or spectators afterwards, particularily if the player taking the penalty kick did not score (ie. practice your Man Management Skills).
Secondly let's deal what should have happenned.  The referee made an error but cannot change the facts to suit the error.  The play was stopped therefore it was stopped.  The reason for the stoppage dictates the actions described above.  What should have happened is that the referee allows play to continue, the ball goes in the net and a goal is awarded.  The player is cautioned for USB (some would argue, leave well enough alone and don't caution).  There is no red card because a goal was not denied.