2009/10 Indoor Season
Click on the
following links to see the full question and response:
Towards the end of a co-ed game
an incident occurred right in font of the referee\'s box with a female player
getting knocked over by a male player from the opposing team. I called a foul
and the box referee indicated a caution and yellow card was appropriate. The
card was shown and while the female player was being attended to, she was
winded by the contact, the buzzer sounded for full time.
As the teams were leaving the
field the box referee described the contact in more detail, saying the male
player was deliberately aggressive, and I realized that a red card for SFP
would have been more appropriate.
Play had not been restarted after
the incident and then the buzzer sounded for full time. Could I have changed
the yellow to a red even though the game had already finished?
Response: The short answer is that yes, the referee could have reversed his decision. The Laws stipulate that the referee may reverse his decision "...provided that he has not restarted play or Terminated the match.". In the context of the Laws, "Terminated" means (in more common, if incorrect vernacular) "Abandoned". The match ending does not fit either of these criteria. So yes, the yellow could have been rescinded and a red issued.
This is probably a good learning experience in that the Ref and AR are a “Team”. Top level Officials are aware of their respective experience levels. For less experienced Officials handling the AR duties, it may be appropriate to discuss the incident with the AR (especially if the Ref did not see the incident). As mentioned above, the Laws/Rules of the game do spell out how a Referee can change a decision. At top level games, players respect this. At lower level games, some players may contest a change (I know they shouldn’t, but they do), so taking a few seconds to discuss the incident with the AR, then showing the card may avoid a heated debate.
At a recent indoor game a U16B
player completely removed his shirt to celebrate a goal. The ref chose to ignore this, though it made
me question if a yellow card should have been shown as per the outdoor
regulations.
Is a double minor penalty too
harsh for this offence in indoor soccer.
Also does it make a difference if
the player has an undershirt on? In the above
case he did not, and it really looked like he was just looking for an excuse to
display his body..
Response: By the letter of the FIFA Laws of the Game, this is a caution for Unsporting Behavior (Page 116). ASA Rules of Indoor Soccer (ROIS) mandates that a player receiving a caution must serve a ‘double minor’ penalty, except for the Keeper. A keeper may receive the caution, however a team mate must serve the ‘double minor’ penalty. Therefore the ‘penalty’ is a result of the caution.
Reading the Q and A section of
the indoor rules and think this one does not make sense as it makes it possible
for the keeper to pick up a ball passed deliberately by a team mate:
Rule 15 Ball Out of Play, Ceiling
or Side
August 2009 69
Q. On a kick in from the side,
may the goalkeeper touch the ball with his/her hands, if it has been
deliberately kicked by a team mate?
A. Yes, provided the kick did not
come from outside of the team’s defensive zone.
Response: You are referring to an outdated Rules of Indoor Soccer (ROIS) publication. This document was revised September 14th, 2009, for the 2009/2010 Indoor Season.
ie.
http://albertasoccer.com/clientuploads/2009%20-%202010%20ASA%20-%20Rules%20of%20Indoor%20Soccer%20-%20Final-%20Sept%2014%20(3).pdf
The Q&A passage you referred to in your E-Mail now reads:
Rule 15 Ball Out of Play, Ceiling or Side
Q. On a 'kick in' from the side, may the goalkeeper touch the ball with his/her hands, if it has been deliberately kicked by a team mate?
A. No, the keeper is not allowed to touch the ball with his hands if it has been deliberately kicked to him by a teammate.
I am new to
Response: I’ll answer your 2nd question first. Game Fees are set each season by the Calgary Soccer Federation (CSF) and published on their Website:
www.calgarysoccerfederation.com
When you go to this sight, select Referees from the menu on the left side of the page. Then move the mouse cursor over Information and select Game Fees from the Pop Up.
From this same website, place the mouse
cursor over Courses and Clinics and
select CSF Course Offerings. This sight will explain what you would need
to do to be eligible to officiate Soccer Matches in
Maybe I have missed the page or
interpretation but I am unsure. On two instances last night (one I was the Ref,
the other an AR) a slide tackle was made on an opponent.
In both cases, in my opinion,
safely and cleanly, but much to the disapproval of the other team. No fouls or
free kicks where awarded, but I wonder if you could clarify please.
Should play be stopped for a
foul? Is a card warranted, or will the free kick suffice?
Response: The answer is YES and NO. For CUSA, CWSA and CMSA leagues, as long as the tackle is done without committing a penal offence, it is OK in indoor soccer. I would warn the players to be careful if they are slide tackling in any proximity to the boards, even if the slide tackle is "clean".
Historically the Co-Ed league did not allow “slide tackles”. However with the League Regulation for all Adult Leagues now merged for this season, this statement is not mentioned. So I checked with the Co-Ed League Board of directors and received this response:
“YIKES – that item must have been lost in the merge. Slide tackles are not permitted and are to be cautioned with a yellow card for USB. So sorry that was “lost” we will make sure it is updated for the Spring classes.”
Restart is a Free Kick awarded to the opposing team.
Player A on Team A get's a blue
card, 30 seconds into that penalty, Player B on Team B get's a blue card, both
teams are 4v4. Team B scores thirty
seconds later. Does Team A get their
player back, or do that player have to serve the full penalty?
Response: Referring to ASA Rules of Indoor Soccer, Rule 12 “Relief of Minor Time Penalty”:
“If a team has fewer players on the field of play than its opponents, because one or more players are serving a minor time penalty, and that team is scored upon, then:
• if the earliest unexpired minor time penalty is the last or only time penalty being served by a player, that player returns to the field
• if the earliest unexpired minor time penalty is the first of consecutive time penalties, the balance of the earliest unexpired minor time penalty is relieved, and next time penalty begins
Only one unexpired minor time penalty is relieved for each goal scored against a team.”
So the key phrase for your question is “If a team has fewer players on the field of play than its opponents…”. So the simple answer is “Team A” has to serve the full penalty.
ASA's change on the keeper
handling is something I like, but I've already seen one pair of officials that
"just don't get it." The rule
as stated specifies deliberately kicked, so I figure that is pretty much like
outdoor, no? But, we've had one pair
that gave a free kick off a ball that came off a thigh, accidentally at that...
Response: From what you’ve described, you are correct in your interpretation. And your thoughts of officials that “just don’t get it” doesn’t necessarily stop at the change for Keeper Handling. To resolve this, CSF encourages Team Officials to first talk to the Ref to request a clarification on the call, preferably at half time or full time. You may explain your understanding, but please DON’T debate the call. If the Ref is worth his/her grain of salt, they will review the ASA Rules of Indoor Soccer for future reference. CSF also requests each team to provide a ‘Ref Evaluation’ after each game (both Positive and Constructive Comments). Each team that does this on a regular basis is awarded extra fair play points. CUSA has provided a link to the CSF ‘Ref Evaluation’ on their web site (MENU Bar on Left Side: Forms | Referee Evaluation). CSF periodically reviews these, and if they spot a common pattern, they will contact the Ref.
Can a player be registered and
play, in a Tier 1 team of a senior age(BU14) and also play for a junior age
Tier 1 team (BU14) that he is not registered in, from the same Club???
Response: The simple answer is NO. Refer to CMSA Team Officials Rules of Play, which is the supplement to the ASA Rules of Indoor Soccer, Section IIG:
“1. Tier I – a Tier I player can only play up for a Tier I team in a higher age group.”
“12. For the Tier I/II, Tier II / III, and Tier III/IV seeding rounds, a player can not play for any other Tier I/II, Tier II / III, or Tier III/IV team within their age group…”
To paraphrase, a Tier I BU14 player CAN NOT ‘play up’ laterally within their own group. A Tier I BU14 player CAN ‘play up’ to a Tier I BU16 Team within their club.
During my short tenure as a ref,
I have noticed some player cards have parts of the ID # faded to the point
where it is impossible to read or completely disappeared. This situation has
occurred mainly with O45 Mens, but I have seen the odd O35 card with some
missing #\'s as well. In every case, these players have memorized their # and
are proud of it. My question is: are we to simply NOT ALLOW a player to play in
this situation, or perhaps give a stern warning and report the situation on the
game sheet...Furthermore, has the ASA or CUSA already addressed this situation
or will they in the near future?
Response: CUSA is aware of this problem, and has been replacing cards that have been turned in for Discipline. However this catches a very small percentage of CUSA members. Therefore CUSA is requesting Officials that see these cards during the pre-game check to allow the person to play and note the card condition on the game sheet. CUSA will contact the individual to arrange a replacement.
Does the changes to Rules of
Indoor Soccer regarding the pass back to the Keeper apply for the U10 League?
Response: Yes, the rule regarding a pass back to the keeper applies for all CMSA league U10 thru U18. U10 only has modifies rules for: Duration of Game (ie. last 2 mins is NOT stop time); Scoring to indicate WINS and LOSSES only; Size of the Ball; Play ups; and ID Cards.
A player passes back to his GK a
ball which goes through the air and the GK doesn't catch the ball in his hand
but he boxes it. Can a referee call that a pass back and automatically award a
FK to the opponent team????
Response: No one likes to see an ‘own goal’, but
technically the Referee can call a ‘pass back’ under the 2009/2010 ASA Rules of Indoor Soccer. ‘Handling’ is not limited to catching and
hanging onto the ball. ‘Handling’ is
defined as touching the ball with the hand(s) or arm. A ‘Pass Back to the Keeper’ is defined as an
intentional pass from the foot of the player to their keeper. Normally a player would pass back to their
keeper on the turf so that the Keeper does not have to ‘handle’ the ball. So the Ref needs to determine if the player
‘mis-kicked’ the ball, or the player did intend to pass it back and for some
reason did not keep the ball on the turf.
If it’s the latter, then YES, the Referee can call a pass back and award
a free kick at the top of the arc. I suspect
the Keeper would rather see that as oppose to letting in an ‘own goal’.
what is boarding???
Response: Boarding is one of the eight penal offences listed under Rule 12 in the 2009/2010 ASA Rules of Indoor Soccer. Boarding is defined on Page 42 of this document:
“Definition
of Boarding:
Boarding
is any contact by a player that forces an opponent to hit the boards that, in
the opinion of the referee is careless, reckless or using excessive force.”
ASA has also published a Power Point Presentation to assist Referees in understanding this offence: Boarding-IndoorRefresherPowerpoint.pps
My son was recently playing a U16
Tier 2/3 game. He was attacked by a boy from the side and another boy tackled
him from the back and my son tripped and fell down. There was no call. Would I
be wrong in thinking that there should have been a call for my son? What should
have the call been? I am thinking that as there was a tackle from the back, a
card should have been given to that player for violent conduct..
Response: You would be incorrect “…in thinking…” a “…card should have been given to that player for violent conduct.” However the level of sanction the Referee may hand out would depend on the severity of the action. Not having seen this 1st hand, I would suspect in the opinion of the Referee this was either a fair challenge or a trifling foul. A player falling down does not necessitate a foul (ie your son tripped over the player as oppose to being tripped by the player).
First: Did the player that ‘attacked’ your son do so in a way that is
considered a ‘fair challenge’. Or did
the player act careless or reckless, which would result in a foul or a Yellow
card for Unsporting Behavior (USB) respectively. Remember just because the player ‘touch the
ball first’ does not mean he was not careless and/or reckless.
Second: The other player “…tackled him from the back…”. I’m going to assume you mean he challenged for the ball by sliding
through your son’s heels. Again the
Referee would need to determine if the act was careless, reckless, and/or
excessive, or a fair challenge. If it was careless and your son’s team
maintained possession, the call may be to ‘Play Advantage’ meaning the foul is
recognized, but no stoppage is required.
If possession was lost, stop play and award a Direct Free Kick. Either decision may warrant a conversation
between the Referee and the Player. If
the challenge was reckless, the Referee may caution the player and show a
Yellow Card for USB. If the challenge
was excessive (ie. going beyond what was needed to gain possession and risking
harm to your son), the Referee may dismiss the player and show a Red Card for
Serious Foul Play (SFP), not Violent Conduct (VC). The difference between SFP and VC is the
discipline handed down from the league.